Crazy title, right? The problem is that many scientists in white lab coats, despite synthetically manufacturing human babies out of blood or stem cells, would never consider themselves witches doing the bidding of demons. Afterall, lab scientists wear white garbs while witches in folklore used to wear black robes and pointy hats when committing child sacrifice. Witches commit their darkness at a visible coven level and ritualistic level while the work of scientists is more hidden in corporate labs and at the microscopic level. Witches knowingly worship demons while today’s blood-soaked scientists believe in nothing greater than themselves. At least the witches understand what they are really doing and so appear smarter than the scientists.
This is from the news about recent advancements in creating human embryos synthetically, June 14-15, 2023 on CNN: “ ‘Unlike human embryos arising from in vitro fertilization (IVF), where there is an established legal framework, there are currently no clear regulations governing stem cell derived models of human embryos. There is an urgent need for regulations to provide a framework for the creation and use of stem cell derived models of human embryos,’ James Briscoe, associate research director at the Francis Crick Institute, said in a statement.”
Why? “Right now, the synthetic model human embryos are confined to test tubes. It would be illegal to implant one in a womb, and animal research with stem cells from mice and monkeys has shown that even when scientists have attempted to implant them, they don’t survive – probably because researchers haven’t figured out how to fully replicate the conditions of pregnancy.” [bold mine]
What happens to developing human life forms in laboratories? Well, many “scientists” cause the developing human life-form (which they coaxed to develop from stem cells) to die before it reaches 14 days of gestation and then they just throw the developing human life away according to the standards of discarding bio-medical waste. But, don’t worry! Since they don’t use language admitting these are developing humans, there is nothing to see here. No, they merely manufactured “models of human embryos” through scientific methods [rituals]. They can claim these human lives were not developed from an ovum and sperm as done in IVF and so these developing “entities” [slaves] fall outside prior legal definitions. Calling them “human embryos” instead of “models” would cause legal problems once a scientist goes past 14 days of development. Of course, it would reveal the actual horror.
Unlike CNN, The Guardian newspaper is clear that some scientists are going past 14 days: “The full details of the latest work, from the Cambridge-Caltech lab, are yet to be published in a journal paper. But, speaking at the conference, Żernicka-Goetz described cultivating the embryos to a stage just beyond the equivalent of 14 days of development for a natural embryo…
“The model structures, each grown from a single embryonic stem cell, reached the beginning of a developmental milestone known as gastrulation, when the embryo transforms from being a continuous sheet of cells to forming distinct cell lines and setting up the basic axes of the body.”
With great virtue-signaling, other scientists allegedly “self-police” and follow the rules for IVF human embryos, not allowing any to develop past 14 days…when their full humanity would be revealed if scientists just publicly tried harder to make implantation a success: “ ‘If the whole intention is that these models are very much like normal embryos, then in a way they should be treated the same,’ Lovell-Badge said. ‘Currently in legislation they’re not. People are worried about this’” [see The Guardian]. Which people are concerned? The ordinary citizenry maybe, because the scientists seem rather unconcerned per quotes from Zernicka-Goetz.
Of course, many do not feel bound by these rules within their private islands of Doctor Moreau. Nevertheless, they will speak of the need for ethics to govern what is horrific and unethical: generating human life outside of the love signified in the total self-gift of man and woman in actual marriage. Afterall, if we are about to knowingly commit evil, we must virtue-signal and speak of ethics for generating a race destined for the slavery of experimentation and organ harvesting. Nothing satanic here that a bunch of pretended ethical standards couldn’t hide…and clean lab rooms with people wearing white.
Worse, our culture has fallen so far away from the wisdom and light of its Christian heritage, that most Christians are doing nothing to stand against this great evil. We are too busy being mesmerized in front of televisions and video games while ghouls are manufacturing humans from blood, specifically stem cells. Perhaps Saruman the White is inspiration to today’s ghouls?
In the Wisdom of Solomon, the Old Testament text explains why God chose to destroy the inhabitants of the promised land which he was about to give to the Israelites: “Those who dwelt of old in your holy land you hated for their detestable practices, their works of sorcery and unholy rites, their merciless slaughter of children, and their sacrificial feasting on human flesh and blood” (12:3-5).
Perhaps if the sorcerers of that time were wearing white lab coats, they would not have appeared so vicious to God’s prophets? Perhaps if those cults ingested their victims through a syringe and needle for embryonic stem cell therapies and in a more sterile environment, then we would not be so bothered? Perhaps if the sorcerers and witches explained their rituals in more white-washed terms of removing disease and restoring health, then God would have decided that the ends justify the means (contrary to the truth of goodness)? Perhaps if these cults were doing these activities at the microscopic level, then God would have been more impressed? Perhaps the Ten Commandments could have been altered to read: “Thou shall not commit murder…except to promote personal health and to cure disease?”
In modern Western culture, we have advanced greatly through the scientific method, a method which developed within Christendom. Most of the great innovators of the scientific revolution were devout Christians. Let’s not forget that Galileo died a devout Catholic and daily communicant because he understood the politics of his day and could separate Church politics from actual dogma. Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics and modern science, was a Catholic monk. Now the scientific method has been removed from a Christian context and practice and allows practices which defy Christian morals and justice. This leads me to share a prophecy that was distributed on SpiritDaily.com. It is known as the “1990 Prophecy” because that is the year it was given to a devout Christian mystic who wished to remain anonymous. In it, Christ delivered a warning to explain the age in which we live and to face the coming challenges of the end of our age. They are challenges that Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger also asked us to face in the Year 2000.
After accurately predicting and warning against the rise of embryonic stem cell research, the “1990 Prophecy” went on to warn:
My greatest nemesis is science, even more so than the media. The science that alters life, the science which creates a counterfeit heaven, the science that toils with the womb and genes, the science that has filled the air with the power of the enemy, the science which creates chemical witchcraft and fouls the earth, the science which seeks to create life but cannot in actuality even sustain it, the science which has denied God.
This will fall, and all of its creations with it.
What had the prophecy said in 1990 which seemingly warned against embryonic stem cell research and cloning?
In four years there will arise a new evil the likes of which mankind has never before encountered. It will arrive almost imperceptibly, with few people noticing the depth of its evil, for it will appear to have beneficial and convenient aspects. It is an evil comparable to abortion -- that is to say, that even if evils as great and widespread as abortion were to be eliminated, this is enough of an evil that it would present mankind with an enormous challenge. This evil is being allowed as a test because of the prayers inspired by Mary to put off chastisements. How mankind responds to this new evil will determine the extent, length, and severity of the first chastisements.
In a commentary which Michael Brown posted under the prophecy, he reminded readers on his Spirit Daily website:
In an encyclical letter called Evangelium Vitae written around this same period [“in four years”] on March 25, 1995, the Supreme Pontiff noted, "The various techniques of artificial reproduction, which would seem to be at the service of life and which are frequently used with this intention, actually open the door to new threats against life. Apart from the fact that they are morally unacceptable, since they separate procreation from the fully human context of the conjugal act, these techniques have a high rate of failure: not just failure in relation to fertilization but with regard to the subsequent development of the embryo, which is exposed to the risk of death, generally within a very short space of time. Furthermore, the number of embryos produced is often greater than that needed for implantation in the woman's womb, and these so-called "spare embryos" are then destroyed or used for research which, under the pretext of scientific or medical progress, in fact reduces human life to the level of simple "biological material" to be freely disposed of.
Only 5 years after Evangelium Vitae, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (the future Benedict XVI) warned in an interview, concerning the production of embryos in laboratories:
We do not know all that may happen in this realm in the future, but we can still be certain of this: God will take action to counter an ultimate crime, an ultimate act of self-destruction, on the part of man. He will take action against the attempt to demean mankind by the production of slave-beings. There are indeed final boundaries we cannot cross without turning into the agents of the destruction of creation itself, without going far beyond the original sin and the first Fall and all its negative consequences. [Joseph Ratzinger, God and the World: A Conversation with Peter Seewald (Ignatius Press, 2002), p.134-135 (originally published in German in 2000)]
In follow-up questions, Cardinal Ratzinger urged all people of good-will to action:
…But we do know we must oppose such a domination of human beings [made through IVF or cloning], which aims to make it possible to manipulate [human life] and dispose of it as required. It is not a matter of attacking the freedom of science or standing in the way of technological advance, but of defending the freedom of God and the dignity of man, for that is what is at stake. It is incumbent on anyone who has gained this insight from his faith – but there are certainly enough non-Christians who share this particular insight – to be committed to ensuring that this boundary is recognized and acknowledged to be uncrossable. [pg. 138]
Pope Benedict, pray for us!